Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you've safely linked to the.gov site. Share sensitive information just on official, secure websites.
- About - The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report an Infraction
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Rights FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct providers of housing, such as property managers and realty companies as well as other entities, such as towns, banks or other loaning institutions and house owners insurance provider whose discriminatory practices make housing not available to individuals due to the fact that of:
race or color.
religious beliefs.
sex.
national origin.
familial status, or.
impairment.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department might file fit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of individuals raises a problem of public value. Where force or threat of force is utilized to deny or interfere with reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice may set up criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers procedures for handling individual grievances of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have actually been victims of an illegal housing practice, might file a grievance with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own suit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings matches on behalf of people based on recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the central goals of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing suppliers try to disguise their discrimination by giving false details about accessibility of housing, either saying that absolutely nothing was offered or guiding homeseekers to certain areas based on race. Individuals who get such false details or misdirection might have no understanding that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought many cases alleging this type of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to uncover this sort of concealed discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. The majority of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have alleged discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually likewise alleged that towns and other regional government entities breached the Fair Housing Act when they rejected permits or zoning changes for housing advancements, or relegated them to mainly minority neighborhoods, due to the fact that the potential citizens were anticipated to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based upon religious beliefs. This restriction covers instances of overt discrimination against members of a particular faith too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances created to limit the use of personal homes as a locations of praise. The variety of cases filed given that 1968 alleging religious discrimination is small in comparison to some of the other restricted bases, such as race or national origin. The Act does consist of a limited exception that allows non-commercial housing operated by a spiritual organization to reserve such housing to individuals of the exact same faith.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Over the last few years, the Department's focus in this area has actually been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, especially those who are poor, and with minimal housing options, frequently have little option however to tolerate the humiliation and destruction of unwanted sexual advances or risk having their families and themselves eliminated from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is targeted at property managers who create an untenable living environment by demanding sexual favors from renters or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this way we seek both to acquire relief for tenants who have been dealt with unjustly by a property owner due to the fact that of sex and also discourage other possible abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with effects. In addition, pricing discrimination in mortgage loaning might likewise negatively affect females, particularly minority females. This type of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country of an individual's birth or where his or her forefathers come from. Census data indicate that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing section of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action versus community governments that have tried to decrease or restrict the number of Hispanic households that may reside in their communities. We have taken legal action against lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have enforced more stringent underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic debtors. The Department has also sued lending institutions for discrimination against Native Americans. Other areas of the nation have experienced an increasing diversity of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This includes new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have actually acted against private landlords who have actually discriminated against such people.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination in housing against households with children under 18. In addition to prohibiting a straight-out denial of housing to households with kids, the Act likewise avoids housing companies from imposing any special requirements or conditions on tenants with custody of children. For example, proprietors may not find households with kids in any single part of a complex, put an unreasonable constraint on the overall number of individuals who might live in a home, or restrict their access to recreational services supplied to other tenants. In many circumstances, the modified Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing provider from declining to rent or sell to households with children. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which satisfies the standards stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually released guidelines and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all kinds of housing deals. The Act specifies individuals with a special needs to imply those people with psychological or physical problems that substantially restrict several significant life activities. The term psychological or physical impairment may consist of conditions such as blindness, hearing impairment, mobility problems, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcohol addiction, drug addiction, persistent tiredness, discovering impairment, head injury, and mental disorder. The term major life activity might consist of seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual jobs, taking care of one's self, learning, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also secures persons who have a record of such a disability, or are considered as having such a problems. Current users of illegal illegal drugs, individuals founded guilty for illegal manufacture or distribution of an illegal drug, sex culprits, and juvenile wrongdoers are not considered handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no securities to people with or without disabilities who present a direct threat to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone presents such a direct risk should be made on a personalized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based upon general presumptions or speculation about the nature of a special needs. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for individuals with disabilities has actually focused on 2 significant locations. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other regulations worrying land usage are not used to hinder the domestic choices of these individuals, consisting of needlessly limiting common, or gather, property plans, such as group homes. The 2nd location is guaranteeing that freshly constructed multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is available to and functional by people with disabilities, and, in specific, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination versus individuals with disabilities, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some individuals with disabilities may cohabit in congregate living plans, frequently referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act prohibits municipalities and other regional federal government entities from making zoning or land usage decisions or executing land usage policies that leave out or otherwise victimize individuals with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To utilize land usage policies or actions that treat groups of individuals with specials needs less positively than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be an ordinance prohibiting housing for persons with disabilities or a specific kind of disability, such as psychological disease, from finding in a particular area, while permitting other groups of unrelated individuals to cohabit because location.
- To take action versus, or reject an authorization, for a home due to the fact that of the impairment of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a building permit for a home due to the fact that it was planned to provide housing for persons with mental retardation.
- To refuse to make affordable lodgings in land usage and zoning policies and procedures where such lodgings may be necessary to manage persons or groups of persons with impairments a level playing field to utilize and take pleasure in housing. What constitutes an affordable accommodation is a case-by-case determination. Not all requested modifications of guidelines or policies are affordable. If a requested modification imposes an unnecessary monetary or administrative concern on a city government, or if an adjustment creates a basic modification in a regional government's land usage and zoning scheme, it is not a "reasonable" lodging.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing versus individuals with disabilities to consist of a failure "to design and construct" certain new multi-family residences so that they are accessible to and functional by persons with specials needs, and especially individuals who utilize wheelchairs. The Act needs all freshly built multi-family houses of four or more systems planned for very first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have particular functions: an available entrance on an available route, accessible typical and public usage areas, doors sufficiently wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible paths into and through each residence, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in accessible place, supports in restroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and functional cooking areas and bathrooms configured so that a wheelchair can navigate about the space.
Developers, builders, owners, and architects accountable for the style or building and construction of brand-new multi-family housing may be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings fail to meet these design requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought many enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. The majority of the cases have been dealt with by permission decrees providing a variety of kinds of relief, including: retrofitting to bring unattainable features into compliance where practical and where it is not-- alternatives (financial funds or other construction requirements) that will attend to making other housing units accessible; training on the ease of access requirements for those involved in the construction procedure; a mandate that all new housing projects abide by the availability requirements, and financial relief for those injured by the offenses. In addition, the Department has sought to promote availability through building regulations.
